Monday, September 24, 2007

Why Bush Wants Us To Believe Iran's Our Enemy

Short story: I think the Bush administration might switch from the Shi'ite's side to the Sunni's side in Iraq and in the Middle East region.

Before I start, a few things you need to know:

Iran = Shi'ite

Iraq's Government = Shi'ite

Saudi Arabia = Sunni

bin-Laden and Al Qaeda = Sunni

Al Anbar province = Sunni

So General Petraeus gets up and testifies that we need to stay in Iraq. Big reason: things are working in al-Anbar province. Their story has been that this one sheik's tribe struck a deal with group Bush calls "al-Qeada in Iraq" and violence there has gone way down, due to (of course) the Americans.

Of course, it's total bullshit. The violence stopped when we paid the local Sunni's to stop it. We also sat by while they killed and forcibly removed (aka ethnic cleansed) the Shi'ites in al-Anbar. Oh yeah, and that sheik that shook Bush's hand wasn't a sheik at all. For being a phony and helping Bush sell his story, he was assassinated on Thursday, September 21st, the same day Bush bullshitted all of this to the American public .

Anyway, the curious thing, and the reason the al-Anbar story worked so well for the Bush administration, is because both sides were Sunnis. We've basically been fighting Sunni's in Iraq for four and a half years. Sunnis are Al-Qaeda, the insurgents, Saddam Hussein, and the 19 hijackers. Now we are able to create conditions where they are cool with us? How? Why?

Meanwhile, Iraq's government takes a stand and tells Blackwater to get the hell out. The most interesting thing about the Blackwater situation is not that they would randomly kill a bunch of people. Their penchant for disgusting acts of violence has been known for a long time. The most interesting thing is the fact that the Iraqi government is standing up to the United States. Why are the Iraqis standing up now?

Could it be because they are ready for us to leave?

With the official line of bullshit that we've been fed for the past 5 years, this should be a glorious day. The Iraqi government is standing up! They are ready for Americans to leave the country! Right? This is an indication that they are prepared to take the first step in getting us out of Iraq. Sweet. Our boys can come home now since "When Iraq stands up, we'll stand down."

Um, nope. The Bush administration doesn't want to leave Iraq. Are you kidding? They have built the largest embassy in the world there. They've got their military bases in the heart of the Middle East. We've lost 3,798 soldiers, 201 journalists, and 800 contractors . They want the power, oil, money and puppet government that they forced us to sacrifice so much for.

So, this "standing up" thing is a problem. Iraq's government officials, the stander uppers, are Shi'ite. Iran's government is also Shi'ite. Iranians are supporting the Shi'ite's in Iraq, the country right next door (and why wouldn't they? Wouldn't we support Americans living in Mexico if they were caught in a war zone?). If Bush needs to change the current Iraqi government, he might have to flip to partnering with the Sunnis and make Shi'ites the enemy. Iran's government will not sit idle and stay silent if the Shi'ites in Iraq go back to being slaughtered, like they were under Saddam Hussian. Ethnic cleansing of Shi'ites in al-Anbar certainly couldn't have eased that fear.

So, the Bush administration must make Iran an enemy.

And Iran, unlike what the mainstream media keeps saying, is not trying to pick a fight. Quite the opposite. Ahmadinejad is in the United States today. He is having a Q&A at Columbia University, something our president would never do. He said he is not looking to build a nuclear bomb. At the very least, a sign that he is willing to negotiate. He also wanted to pay his respects at the World Trade Center. This has been presented as an outrage (outrage!), but it isn't. His country didn't attack us, he helped us in Afghanistan to hunt down the people who did, and this is America. If a leader of another country wants to visit our historical sites, we should welcome the opportunity to have him understand our history, and get an appreciation of our pain.

Even if he might say things the President doesn't like.

But it plays out like this: The Bush administration wants our military to stay in Iraq but won't tell us their true motivation. They need the Iraqi government either on board with the administration's plan or the current government might need to be demonized and replaced. Iran has been supporting Iraq's Shi'ite government (like we ordered the whole world to do) and will continue to support them. Bush needs to make an enemy out of Iran.

You think this makes sense? Please share your thoughts.

*Big thanks to Cenk Uygur from The Young Turks for helping me to connect some dots with his words this morning on his Air America (AM 1150 in Los Angeles) radio show.

5 comments:

David B. Dancy said...

Jen you are on the money; what most of us in cyberspace worry about the most is the media blackout for dissent and protests against this 'war'.
The suppresion of credible evidence is very worrisome as well.
The global cabal includes the leaders of the countries abroad you spent time in. Just days ago Sarkozy(is that a french name?) subtly hinted that war in Iran is imminent.
He has been enrolled in 'the plan' and no one including Russia is poised to stop it.
The chinese are eerily silent, which leads me to think they are better chess players.
The world is a big place Chainy, Bush and the rest of the oil-tobacoo lobby are trying to divvy it up.
The arctic is now something to fight for; since it has melted we can ship crude now.
They have to get these issues settled they do not have much time, there are other wars to start.
It is Why We Fight.

Jeff Herz - My View of the World said...

Jen,

It is a bit scary how you have nailed the exact thoughts I have been having trouble articulating. This is almost verbatim for many of the random thoughts I just left on my site.

Not sure what we can acheive but the louder our voice, then better served we, the people, will be.

Chuck said...

Hi Jen.

First thanks for the visits and comments on my site. :)

Besides the embassy you mentioned- and the permanent bases, they're building a new base at a site just four miles from the Iranian border.

And of course, you know by now that bush's puppet regime in Iraq has "changed their mind" about kicking the Blackwater mercs out. bush/cheney reminded them that their private army is above any law.

Chuck said...

Hey. I just saw your link to my site. Thank you! I'll reciprocate immediately. :)

Jen Clark said...

Here is a response I got to the same article at Blogger News Network from a reader from Finland:

"ah it would be SO beautiful if that two-horned-wild-bastard, a.k.a. “the anglo-american world power” would quit with the self deluded world savior crap.

U.S. cannot even “save” it’s own people from the problems in todays world. Who the heck do they think they are to propose standards upon others?

One of the most common “standards” uttered from an American (such as that idiot Bollinger, the President of Columbia U) is that of “human rights”. As if U.S. has or supports “human rights”. Look at the prisoners in Gitmo for one thing. Or U.S. alliances with countries such as Uzbekistan, Tajikistan or Saudi Arabia. "

Looks like the rest of the world is paying pretty close attention to the United States. I wish Americans would give the US the same kind of consideration.